High CourtsSingle Bench

Nanjaiah vs Siddamma & Others

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 2 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 KAR CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
H.P. Sandesh, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Regular Second Appeal No. 852 Of 2019 (INJ)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 125 words

H.P. Sandesh, J

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant.

The counsel for the appellant submits that office objections are raised subsequent to the order passed by this Court on 23.06.2022. The office objections raised only with regard to I.A.No.3/2022 which was filed on 05.07.2022 and earlier to that there were two office objections on I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2022 and this Court granted two weeks’ time to comply with the office objections and also made it clear that if office objections are not complied with within the stipulated time, list the matter for dismissal for non-prosecution. Inspite of time was granted vide order dated 23.06.2022, till date, office objections are not complied with. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.