High CourtsSingle Bench

Nar Bahadur Chettri (Khatiwada) & Anr. vs Devi Lall Khatiwada & Ors.

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 25 May 2026 · Citation: (2026) 05 SIK CK 1092

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
CASE NUMBER
Second Appeal From Judgment And Decree No. 02 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 126 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

1.

The learned counsel appearing for respondent nos.1 to 12, 17 and 18 submits that the learned counsel leading him is unable to appear today as his father in unwell and therefore, seeks an adjournment. The same is not opposed by the learned Senior Counsel for the parties.

2.

As mentioned earlier, the matter has been pending for a considerable period of time and for the interest of justice, the matter has to be disposed of at the earliest. It may not be prudent to not grant an adjournment on the personal ground of learned counsel therefore, the adjournment is granted. The learned counsel are requested to be ready on the next date for final hearing.

3.

List the matter on 24.06.2026.