High CourtsSingle Bench

Narayan Lal Chandrakar vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 25 April 2018 · Citation: (2018) 04 CHH CK 0313

HON’BLE JUDGES
ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420, 477A · Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 13(1)(d)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
M.Cr.C. No.957 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 523 words
1.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the Applicant who has been

arrested in connection with Crime No.RC1242016A0005/2016 registered at Police Station C.B.I., A.C.B., District Raipur for offence punishable

under Sections 120B, 420, 477A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2), 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

2.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that a godown of Food Corporation of India (hereinafter referred to as “the FCIâ€) is situated in

Mahasamund and a separate godown of State Warehousing Corporation is also situated in Mahasamund. Arrangement of transportation of stored

grains of the FCI is made by the FCI itself. For the transportation, the FCI had engaged Chhattisgarh Gadiwan Hamal Reza Mazdoor Mahasangh,

Mahasamund (hereinafter referred to as 'the Mahasanghâ€). The Applicant was a member of the Mahasangh. It is alleged that by collusion with the

officers of the FCI and the transporters, the Applicant prepared forged work-slips and bills and submitted the same before the FCI for payment and

thereby he caused a loss of Rs.67,97,186/- to the FCI.

3.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant submits that the Applicant has been falsely implicated in the case. He is innocent. The work of the

Applicant was only to prepare bills and not to receive or release payment on behalf of the Mahasangh. No payment has been done or received by the

Applicant himself. He never used or spent any amount of the Mahasangh. It is further submitted that the FCI had filed a civil suit against the

Mahasangh before the Commercial Court at Raipur for recovery of the loss caused to it and vide judgment dated 9.1.2018, the Commercial Court has

decreed the suit in favour of the FCI and against the Mahasangh. It is further submitted that the Applicant is a 68 years' old person and is a heart-

patient. Charge-sheet has already been filed. He is in custody since 3.1.2018. Trial will take a long time. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent/CBI opposes the bail application. He submits that the Applicant has caused a loss of Rs.67,97,186/-

to the FCI and there is sufficient material available against him on record.

5.

I have heard Learned Counsel appearing for the parties and perused the entire material available with due care.

6.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions put-forth, particularly, that the age of the Applicant is about

68 years, he is a heart-patient, charge-sheet has already been filed, he is in jail since 3.1.2018 and trial is likely to take some time, without further

commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to enlarge him on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

8.

It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rupees Two Lakhs with two solvent sureties

each of Rupees One Lakh to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.