High CourtsDivision Bench(1897) 10 MAD CK 0004

Narayana Chetti vs Lakshmana Chetti

Madras High Court · Decided on 21 October 1897 · Citation: (1898) ILR (Mad) 256

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arthur J.H. Collins, C.J · Shephard, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 73 words
1.

According to the law declared in the Contract Act, Section 43, especially when taken with Section 29 of the Civil Procedure Code, it is clear

that it is not incumbent on a person dealing with partners to make them all defendants. He is at liberty to sue any one partner as he may choose,

Lukmidas Khimji v. Purshotam Haridas ILR 6 Bom. 700.

2.

The petition must therefore be dismissed with costs.