High CourtsSingle Bench

Narinder Singh @ Ninder vs State Of Punjab And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 12 October 2022 · Citation: (2022) 10 P&H CK 0041

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 9741 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 156 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

The present petition has been filed for issuance of directions to the respondents to extend the parole of the petitioner for four weeks on the medical grounds.

Learned counsel for the State has opposed the present petition on the ground that the jurisdiction of this Court qua parole is only restricted to arbitrariness or in the denial order, which is not existing.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be contended and satisfied in case, he may be permitted to file fresh application for parole on medical grounds and concerned Superintendent of Jail is directed to decide the same within time bound manner.

The prayer is genuine.

Given above, the present petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file fresh application for parole before the concerned Superintendent of Jail, who shall decide the same within four working days from the date of its filing.