High CourtsSingle Bench

Narola and Others vs IFFCO Tokio Ins. and Otrs.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 1 August 2013 · Citation: (2013) 08 DEL CK 0133

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suresh Kait, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Section 163A, 166
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MAC. APP. 266 of 2013
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 441 words

Suresh Kait, J.—The present appeal is for enhancement of the compensation amount of Rs. 2,90,000/- which was awarded by the learned Tribunal in Suit No. 50/11 passed in a claim petition preferred u/s 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act). The only ground of challenge raised by the learned counsel for the appellants is that though the claim petition was filed by the appellants/claimants u/s. 163-A of the Act, however, the learned Tribunal has granted compensation as per Section 166 of the Act and that the multiplier has to be applied as per the age of the deceased and not as per the age of the claimant.

2.

In view of the above, the present case is covered by a judgment of this Court in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pitamber & Ors., (MAC. APP. 304/2009) decided on 23.01.2012. This Court referred to the decision in Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Pataso & Ors., MAC APP. 962/2005 decided on 01.09.2008; Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Om Prakash & Ors., 1 (2009) ACC 148; Jagdish & Anr. Vs. Madhav Raj Mishra and Anr. MAC APP. 190/2011 decided on 19.04.2011; and Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Anita Devi and Others, decided on 10.05.2011; The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. etc. Vs. Hansrajbhai V.Kodala and Others etc. etc., ; and Deepal Girishbhai Soni and Others Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Baroda, ; and held that in a petition u/s 163-A of the Act there is a cap of Rs. 40,000/- on the annual income and the compensation including non-pecuniary damages have to be awarded as per the Second Schedule.

3.

Hence, the loss of dependency comes to Rs. 4,53,333/- (Rs. 40,000/- X 2/3 X 17).

4.

The compensation awarded towards funeral expenses as Rs. 10,000/- is not consistence with the Second Schedule. Therefore, the Appellants are entitled to a sum of Rs. 2,000/- towards funeral expenses. Since the present appeal is being decided u/s. 163-A of the Act, therefore, appellants are also entitled for compensation of Rs. 2,500/- towards loss of Estate. I grant accordingly.

5.

In view of the above, the overall compensation comes to Rs. 4,57,833/-.

6.

The enhanced compensation of Rs. 1,67,833/- (Rs. 4,57,833-Rs. 2,90,000) shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of the filing of the petition till its payment.

7.

The Respondent No. 1/National Insurance Company Ltd. is directed to deposit the enhanced amount of Rs. 1,67,833/- along with interest with the Registrar General of this Court within six weeks from today. On deposit, the enhanced compensation shall be released in favour of the claimants. The Appeal is allowed in above terms.