AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
2 paragraphs · 205 wordsHon''ble Bala Krishna Narayana, J.—Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. The applicants, through the present application u/s 482 Cr. P.C., have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court with a prayer that their bail application in Case No. 4778/IX of 2003, Case Crime No. 1870 of 1995, under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Banda be ordered to be considered expeditiously, if possible on the same day by the Courts below.
After hearing learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. this application is finally disposed of with a direction that if the applicants appear and surrender before the Court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, then their bail application shall be considered and decided by both the courts below in accordance with the settled law laid down by the Seven Judges'' decision of this Court in the case of Amarawati and another Vs. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57) ALR-290, as well as judgment passed by Hon''ble Apex Court reported in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Others, . after hearing the Public Prosecutor in the aforesaid crime number for the aforesaid offence.
