AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
2 paragraphs · 166 wordsKurian Joseph, C.J.—The Petitioners claim work charge status on completion of eight years of continuous serviceas daily waged beldar. According to the Petitioners,the issue is covered in their favour by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No. 2735 of 2010, Rakesh Kumar v. State of H.P. and Ors. It is for the Respondents to examine the matter. We are informed that the State has filed an appeal against the above mention decision. Therefore, it is made clear that the implementation of the judgment, referred to above, would depend on the out come of the decision of the Apex Court. The needful action, after verifying the facts, will be taken within a period of two months from the date of the judgment of the Apex Court. The Petitioner(s) will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition(s) before the 3rd Respondent/competent authority.
With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.
