High CourtsSingle Bench

Nasir Ali Alias Guddu vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 11 February 2022 · Citation: (2022) 02 UK CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 8, 21, 50
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 296 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 225 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Nasir Ali @ Guddu, is in judicial custody, in FIR No. 437 of 2021, under Sections 8/21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic

Substances Act, 1985 (for short, “the Actâ€​), Police Station Lalkuan, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

3.

According to the case,106.90 grams of smack was recovered from the possession of the applicant.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that there is non-compliance of Section 50 of the Act. The applicant is not a previous convict and

he is in custody for a long.

5.

Learned State counsel would admit that in the bail rejection order, there is no mention of the previous conviction or previous history of the applicant.

6.

Having considered, under the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to

be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant Nasir Ali @ Guddu be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like

amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

9.

This bail order be forwarded to concerned Court as well as the concerned jail through e-mail also.