High CourtsSingle Bench

Nasir vs State of Uttaranchal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 31 October 2001 · Citation: (2002) 1 UC 321

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 161 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 34, 354, 376, 511
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Bail Application No. 965 of 2001

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 128 words

P.C. Verma, J.—Heard Km. Rekha Chawla learned Counsel for applicant as well as learned Addl. Govt. Advocate.

2.

According to the learned Counsel for applicant, the applicant has falsely been implicated as in evident from the medical report and even from the statement made by the prosecutrix u/s 161 of Cr.RC.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances, I find that it is a fit case in which the applicant shall be released on bail.

4.

Accordingly, the applicant Nasir S/o Ali Gohar be released on bail in case Crime No. 609/2001, under Sections 376, 354, 511 and 34 I.P.C.P. S. Kela Khera, Bazpur, Distt. U.S. Nagar, on his furnishing a personal bond with adequate sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of C.J. M. Udham Singh Nagar.