High CourtsDivision Bench(1896) 12 AHC CK 0017

Nathu Wilson vs C.H. McAfee and Another

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 3 December 1896 · Citation: (1897) ILR (All) 131

HON’BLE JUDGES
John Edge, J · Burkitt, J
RESULT
Dismissed

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 156 words

John Edge, Kt., C.J. and Burkitt, J.—This is an appeal from an order under the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 (Act No. II of 1882) refusing to remove a trustee. Mr. Ryves has objected that no appeal lay. Mr. Banerji contends that the order was a decree, as that word is defined in Section 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure. So far as we are aware this point has never been decided. The case of Mohima Chunder Biswas v. Tarini Sunker Ghose ILR 19 Cal. 487 is not of much assistance, as in that case Act No. VIII of 1890, which was the Act in question, did provide for appeals in certain cases. We think it would be stretching the definition of "decree" in Section 2 of the CPC to hold that it included a refusal to dismiss a trustee. We are of opinion that the appeal did not lie, and we dismiss it with costs.