High CourtsSingle Bench

Naurang Singh vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 UK CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 409, 420, 466, 467, 468, 471 · Prevention Of Corruption Act, 1988 — Section 7A · Constitution Of India, 1950 — Article 21
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 358 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 459 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

This Application has been filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of Anticipatory Bail under Sections 120B, 409, 420, 466, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 7 A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, in connection with the First Information Report No.07 of 2020(Special Sessions Trial No.32 of 2022), registered at police station Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2.

A Special Investigation Team was constituted in compliance with the order of this Court, passed in Writ Petition No.33 of 2019. Mr. Bhim Bhaskar Arya, the Inspector, was a member of the said Investigation Team. He enquired the matter and lodged an FIR on 05.01.2020.

3.

Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. M.K. Chand, learned A.G.A. for State.

4.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate, contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. He is not named in the First Information Report. His role has been shown as a middleman. He has not received any scholarship amount. He was granted interim relief by this Court during the investigation. One named co-accused Chandra Prakash has already been granted bail by this Court. Applicant is a permanent resident of District Udham Singh Nagar, therefore, there is no chance of his absconding. He does not have any criminal antecedents. Charge-sheet has been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation.

5.

Mr. M.K. Chand, learned A.G.A. appearing for State, has opposed the Anticipatory Bail Application orally. However, he has submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigating Officer, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation.

6.

Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, applicant-Naurang Singh is directed to be released on Anticipatory Bail, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing his personal bond of Rs. 30,000/- and two reliable sureties, each in the like amount on the following conditions:-

(i) Applicant shall attend the Trial court regularly and he shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(ii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person, acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iii) Applicant shall not leave the country without the previous permission of the Trial Court.

8.

It is clarified that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the concerned authority will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

9.

Anticipatory Bail Application (No.358 of 2024) stands disposed of accordingly.