High CourtsSingle Bench

Neelam Rani And Others vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 16 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0284

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gurvinder Singh Gill, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 294, 420, 506 · Punjab Prevention Of Human Smuggling Act, 2013 — Section 13 · Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438(2)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 25573 Of 2020 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 344 words

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J

1.

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered vide FIR No.129 dated 28.6.2019 at

Police Station City Jagraon, District Ludhiana under Sections 420, 294, 506, 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 13 of Punjab Prevention of

Human Smuggling Act, 2013.

2.

At the time of issuance of notice of motion the following order was passed:

“The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter basically pertains to some monetary transaction between theÂ

husband of petitioner No.1 namely Shri Darshan Lal Malhotra and the complainant and that the petitioners, who are the wife and two unmarried

daughters of said Darshan Lal Malhotra, have been falsely implicated simply to pressurize Darshan Lal Malhotra to shell out some money.

Notice of motion for 16.12.2020.

Meanwhile, in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on interim bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety bonds to the

satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. However, the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate

with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.â€​

3.

The learned State counsel upon instructions from ASI Atma Singh has informed that upon verification it has been found that no amount was ever

deposited in the accounts of any of the petitioners and that they have already joined the investigation.

4.

Having regard to the aforestated position especially that the present case appears to be a case arising out of some monetary transaction and that no

amount is stated to have been deposited in the accounts of the petitioners, who are all ladies, the petition is accepted and the interim directions issued

by this Court vide order dated 2.9.2020 are hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioners shall join investigation as and when called

upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.