High CourtsSingle Bench

Netram vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 August 2024 · Citation: (2024) 08 UK CK 0138

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 304B
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1269 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 137 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody FIR No. 14 of 2024, under Section 304B IPC, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

It is argued that co-accused Munni Devi, who is wife of the applicant has already been granted bail. The applicant is father-in-law. His role is similar.

4.

Learned State counsel admits these facts.

5.

Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.