High CourtsSingle Bench

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Sunita Pradhan

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 24 June 2024 · Citation: (2024) 06 SIK CK 0098

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
I.A. No. 01 Of 2024 In Motor Accident Claim Appeal 11 Of 2024/(Filing No.)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 121 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Learned Senior Counsel Mr. S. S. Hamal along with Learned Counsel enters appearance for the substituted Respondent today. Learned Counsel assisting Learned Senior Counsel undertake to file Vakalatnama during the course of the day.

I.A. No.01 of 2024 is an application seeking condonation of 133 days’ delay in filing the Appeal.

The application is not objected to by Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent.

Considered submissions as also the grounds put forth in the application. I find that the delay has been sufficiently explained.

Delay condoned.

I.A. No.01 of 2024 stands disposed of accordingly.

Register the Appeal.

Heard.

Admit the Appeal.

Call for the records from the Learned Claims Tribunal.

Let Paper-Books be prepared.

List on 02-09-2024.