High CourtsSingle Bench

New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Santosh & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 23 November 2017 · Citation: (2017) 11 DEL CK 0229

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.K.Gauba, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC. Appeal No. 800 Of 2012, Civil Miscellaneous No. 12708 Of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 536 words

R.K.Gauba, J

1.

While awarding compensation in the total sum of Rs.22,72,512/-, with interest at the rate of 9% p.a., in favour of the first to sixth respondents

(collectively, the claimants) on their accident claim case (MACT 149/10/08), instituted on 04.04.2008, on account of death of Ram Chander, in a motor

vehicular accident that occurred on 25.08.2007, due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle described as a Crane bearing registration no.HR-39A-6721,

the liability was fastened on the appellant (insurer) to pay, it having concededly issued an insurance policy covering third party risk for the crane for

the period in question. The said compensation includes Rs.19,42,512/-towards loss of dependency, Rs.10,000/- for funeral charges, Rs.1,20,000/- for

loss to estate, Rs.50,000/- towards loss of consortium and Rs.1,50,000/- towards loss of love & affection & company etc. The tribunal also directed

the insurance company to pay Rs.70,000/- as counsel fee and Rs.5,000/- as out of pocket expenses to the counsel for the petitioner.

2.

The appeal at hand is pressed only to seek modification of the award under the non-pecuniary heads of damages so as to bring it in accord with

ruling of a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court rendered on 31.10.2017 in SLP (C) 25590/2014, National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay

Sethi and Ors. and to take exception to the inclusion of counsel fee and out of pocket expenses in the directions.

3.

The appeal was admitted and put in the list of ‘Regulars’ by orders dated 13.07.2015. Upon it being called out, there is no appearance for the

claimants. The appeal has been heard with the assistance of the learned counsel for the insurer and the record of the tribunal perused.

4.

The modification based on the ruling in Pranay Sethi (supra) is called for. Thus, in lieu of the awards towards the non-pecuniary damages granted

by the tribunal, Rs.40,000/- for loss of consortium and Rs.15,000/- each for funeral expenses and loss of estate are added. The compensation thus is to

be reduced to [Rs.19,42,512/- + Rs.40,000/- + Rs.15,000/- + Rs.15,000/-], Rs.20,12,512/-, rounded off to Rs.20,13,000/- (Rupees Twenty lakh and

thirteen thousand only). Needless to add, the award shall carry interest as levied by the tribunal.

5.

There being no justification for such inclusion, the directions for payment of counsel’s fee and out of pocket expenses are set aside.

6.

By order dated 27.07.2012, the insurance company was directed to deposit the entire awarded amount with up-to-date interest excluding

lawyer’s fee and out of pocket expenses with UCO Bank, Delhi High Court branch and from out of such deposit, seventy five percent (75%) was

permitted to be released to the claimants. The Registry shall now calculate the remainder of the amount payable to the claimants and release the same

to them. Having regard to the fact that the apportionment in favour of the claimants was specified, it is directed that the amounts already received by

the claimants other than first respondent Santosh (widow) shall be treated as their respective shares, the entire balance now to go to her alone. The

excess in deposit with statutory deposit shall be refunded to the insurance company.

7.

The appeal and the pending application are disposed of in above terms.