High CourtsSingle Bench

Nibin Khan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 22 August 2022 · Citation: (2022) 08 KL CK 0175

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 109, 312, 376, 376(2)(n)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 6372 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 416 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1.

This is an application seeking regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.258/2022 of Kottayam West Police Station, Kottayam District, The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 376, 376(2)(n), 109 and section 312 read with section 34 of the of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

3.

According to the prosecution, petitioner, who is alleged to be love with the victim from 2019 onwards committed sexual assault on her with the promise of marriage on several days at different places and even took her to Kulu and Delhi and committed sexaul assault at those places also and subsequently, when she became pregnant he along with the immediate relatives forced her to terminate the pregnancy and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4.

Sri.P.Vijayabhanu, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the entire prosecution case is false and the incident as alleged had never occurred. It was further pointed out that consequent to the dismissal of the application for pre-arrest bail, petitioner surrendered on 20.07.2022 and he has been in custody since then and hence continued detention may not be required.

4.

Sri.K.A.Noushad, learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand opposed the grant of bail and submitted that releasing the petitioner at this stage would cause prejudice to the investigation.

6.

Having regard to the circumstances of the case including the statement given by the victim and the age of the petitioner, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required. Accordingly, I allow this application with the following conditions:

(a) Petitioner shall be released on bail on him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) Petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required.

(c) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the victim or her family members.

(d) Petitioner shall not commit any similar offences while he is on bail.

(e) Petitioner shall not leave India without the permission of the Court having jurisdiction.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.