High CourtsDivision Bench

Nijabutoolla and Others vs Wazir Ali

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 6 February 1882 · Citation: (1882) ILR (Cal) 910

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tottenham, J · Cunningham, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5, 6
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 129 words

Cunningham, J.—We think that the proper interpretation to be put upon Section 5 of the Limitation Act, considered along with Section 6, is that, except as defined in Section 6, the general provisions of the Limitation Act are applicable to cases for which periods of limitation are specially provided by local or special loss; and that therefore Section 5 of the Limitation Act ought to have been allowed to operate in the present case.

2.

We accordingly set aside the decisions of the lower Courts, and remand the case to the first Court for a decision on the merits.

3.

Costs will abide the result.

Tottenham, J.

4.

I desire simply to add that Section 5 is of general application to all suits notwithstanding anything contained in Section 6.