High CourtsSingle Bench

Nijas vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 28 June 2022 · Citation: (2022) 06 KL CK 0331

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 354A(1)(i), 363, 384, 506 · Information Technology Act, 2000 — Section 67B · Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — Section 7, 8, 9(l), 10, 11(ii), 11(iv), 11(v), 12
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 4219 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 476 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1.

This is an application for regular bail filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.232/2022 of the Mangalapuram Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under Sections 363, 354A(1)(i), 384 & Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 67B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Sections 8,7,10,9 (l), 12, 11(ii) (iv) & (v) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

3.

The prosecution case is that, petitioner, who is a family friend of the victim had been in acquaintance with her for the last two years and misusing the friendship, committed aggravative sexual assault on the victim, aged 16 years in September 2021 and December 2021 and thus committed the offences alleged.

4.

Sri.Shajin S.Hameed, learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was arrested on 10.03.2022 and has been in custody since then. According to him, the entire prosecution allegation is false and the petitioner ought to be enlarged on bail.

5.

Smt.M.K.Pushpalatha, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of bail and submitted that the allegations are serious in nature and that if the petitioner is released on bail, it would prejudice the prosecution. It was also submitted that the final report was filed as early as on 09.05.2022.

6.

Considering the young age of the petitioner and on a perusal of the case diary, I am of the view that the continued detention of the petitioner is not required in the circumstances of the case, more so since the investigation is over and the final report has already been filed. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail.

In the result, this application is allowed on the following conditions:-

(a) The petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction.

(b) The petitioner shall co-operate with the trial of the case.

c) Petitioner shall not enter into the jurisdictional limits of Mangalapuram Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, nor in any place near MV Higher Secondary School, where the victim studies, till the conclusion of the trial.

(d) Petitioner shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses; nor shall he tamper with the evidence or contact the victim or her family members;

(e) The petitioner shall not commit any similar offence while he is on bail.

(f) The petitioner shall not leave the country without the permission of the jurisdictional Court.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the jurisdictional Court shall be empowered to consider the application for cancellation, if any, and pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law, notwithstanding the bail having been granted by this Court.