High CourtsSingle Bench

Nilesh Tiwari vs Union Of India And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 30 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 SIK CK 1656

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 27 Of 2025
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 66 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that Mr. Pramit Chettri, Counsel on record does not seek to represent the Petitioner and he seeks to withdraw his Vakalatnama.

Considered and allowed.

Learned Counsel Mr. M. N. Dhungel enters appearance for the Petitioner and undertakes to file his Vakalatnama during the course of the day.

List on 04-06-2026 as found convenient by the parties.