AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
25 paragraphs · 466 wordsVishnu Pratap Singh Chauhan, J
Heard on this first post-arrest application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail.
The applicant is in jail since 24.04.2020 in connection with Crime No.72/2020, registered at Police Station-Baxwah, District-Chhatarpur for offence
under Sections 363, 376(a), 376(2) of IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act.
The case of the prosecution, in short, is that, on the date of incident prosecutrix, who was minor at the time of incidence, and her sister went to the
forest for picking Mahua Flower. At that time applicant along with other co-accused appeared there and allured both the girls. Both girls went along
with the applicant and co-accused and there applicant committed rape upon the prosecutrix.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the case. Prosecutrix in her statement recorded under
Section 164 of CrPC did not state anything about rape, she only stated that she went for taking a ride with the applicant, but applicant did nothing with
her. It is further submitted that after investigation charge-sheet has been filed. The applicant is in custody since 24.04.2020 and trial will take
considerable time for its disposal. Looking to the present situation of widespread of Novel Corona Virus (Covid-19), it is prayed that the applicant be
enlarged on bail.
On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State has vehemently opposed the application and prays for dismissal of this application.
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of CrPC. No doubt Considering
all the above facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that charge-sheet has been filed and the applicant is not required for any further
investigation and also looking to the present situation of widespread of Novel Corona virus (Covid-19), without commenting on the merits of the case,
this Court is inclined to release the applicant on bail.
 It is directed that applicant Nirbal @ Hallu Sour shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty
Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, for his regular appearance before the trial Court with a
condition that he shall remain present before the Court concerned during trial and shall also abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 437(3)
of Cr.P.C.
 This order shall be effective till the end of the trial, however, in case of bail jump, it shall become ineffective.
 Jail authorities and State Government are directed to follow the guidelines issued by the Health Ministry in the wake of Novel Corona Virus, before
and after releasing the applicant.
 Certified copy as per rules.
