Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2002) 01 SC CK 0025

Nirma Ltd. vs Lurgi Lentjes Energietechnik GMBH and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 14 January 2002 · Citation: AIR 2002 SC 3695 : (2003) 1 ALLMR 366 : (2002) 3 ARBLR 30 : (2002) 4 CompLJ 184 : (2002) 6 JT 117 : (2002) 4 LW 643 : (2002) 5 SCALE 10 : (2002) 5 SCC 520 : (2002) 3 SCR 911 : (2002) 2 UC 609 : (2002) 2 UJ 1245

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. C. Lahoti, J · K. G. Balakrishnan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
SLP(C) No.-022106-022106 / 2001

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 215 words
1.

This is a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, seeking leave to file civil appeal against an appellate order of the XIth City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, passed under Sub-section (2) of Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. We are not inclined to entertain this SLP inasmuch as, in our opinion, an efficacious alternate remedy is available to the petitioner by way of filing a revision in the High Court u/s 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Merely because a second appeal against an appellate order is barred by the provisions of Sub-section (3) of Section 37, the remedy of revision does not cease to be available to the petitioner, for the City Civil Court deciding an appeal under Sub-section (2) of Section 37 remains a court subordinate to the High Court within the meaning of Section 115 CPC. In taking this view, we find support from a decision of this Court in Shyam Sunder Agarwal and Co. Vs. Union of India, .

2.

The SLP is, therefore, dismissed. The petitioner may file a revision before the High Court and in calculating the limitation, the petitioner shall be entitled to exclusion of time spent in this Court i.e. between the date of filing of the SLP and today.