High CourtsSingle Bench

Nirmal Kaur And Another vs Gagandeep And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 5 February 2019 · Citation: (2019) 02 P&H CK 0096

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.S. Walia, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal Order No. 5075 Of 2016 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 384 words

B.S. Walia, J

1.

Appeal has been filed by the parents of Sahilpreet Singh, who died in a motor vehicular accident on 21.6.2014. The learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amritsar (hereinafter referred to as 'the Tribunal') by taking into account the age of the deceased as 12 years as also that he was a student took into account notional income of the deceased @ Rs.15,000/- per annum and by applying multiplier of 15, awarded compensation of Rs.2,25,000/- + Rs.25,000/- on account of funeral expenses, total Rs.2,50,000/-.

2.

Learned counsel by placing reliance upon the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Kishan Gopal versus Lala and others 2013 (4) RCR (Civil) 276 contended that the appellants were entitled to award of compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- alongwith interest with effect from the date of claim petition till the date of payment.

3.

Per contra, Sh. Vinod Gupta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.3-Insurance Company contends that no parity can be drawn by the appellants with the decision in Kishan Gopal's case (supra) in view of the fact that in the instant case, there was no evidence with regard to the deceased assisting his parents as was the situation in Kishan Gopal's case (supra). Learned counsel for the Insurance Company, however, fairly contended that the appellants were entitled to enhancement of compensation and that respondent No.3 would be willing to make payment of Rs.2,50,000/-more in addition to sum of Rs.2,50,000/- awarded by the Tribunal but without interest.

4.

Learned counsel for the appellants accepts the offer made on behalf of respondent No.3.

5.

Accordingly, appeal is disposed of. Award is modified and as against compensation of Rs.2,50,000/- awarded by the learned Tribunal, the appellants are held entitled to award of Rs.5,00,000/- i.e. Rs.2,50,000/- in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal, however, the aforementioned additional amount of Rs.2,50,000/- would not carry any interest. The same would be paid within a period of two months from today. In case the payment of additional amount of Rs.2,50,000/- is not made within two months, the same would carry interest @ 7.5.% per annum with effect from the date of claim petition till date of payment.

6.

Appeal is disposed of by modifying award dated 1.3.2016 passed by the MACT, Amritsar to the extent as noted above.