High CourtsSingle Bench

Nirmal Kumar Pradhan vs Aruna Gurung

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 10 November 2022 · Citation: (2022) 11 SIK CK 0025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 151 · Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 22 Rule 4(1)
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal From Order No. 01 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 108 words

Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J

I.A. No. 03 of 2022

An application for substitution under Order XXII Rule 4 (1) read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed on behalf of the applicant.

Mr. Amrit Kumar Gurung desires to substitute Late Aruna Gurung, sole respondent in the present case. Mr. Sudesh Joshi, learned counsel for the appellant desires to file a response to this application. Four weeks to do the same is granted. Mr. Rahul Rathi, learned counsel for the respondent desires to file a Vakalatnama in favour of Mr. Amrit Kumar Gurung during the course of the day. Permitted.

List on 14.12.2022.