High CourtsSingle Bench

Nitish vs Union Of Territory, Chandigarh

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 P&H CK 0101

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lalit Batra, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420, 511
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 4054 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 365 words

Lalit Batra, J

Present petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C has been moved by petitioner-NITISH for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.291 dated 05.12.2019 under

Sections 120-B, 420 and 511 IPC, registered at Police Station Sector-31, Chandigarh.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that allegations levelled in the FIR are totally concocted, false and frivolous and there is no iota

of truth therein. He further submits that neither the alleged question paper was leaked nor the examination was cancelled or even postponed. He

further submits that no money transaction ever took place and it is not even the case of prosecution that money is to be recovered. He further submits

that petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2019 and he is no more required by the Investigating Agency for any investigation purpose. He further submits

that challan has already been presented in Court and since trial of the case would take sufficient time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served

by keeping the petitioner in custody further and he may be released on bail.

On the other hand, learned counsel for respondent-UT while opposing instant petition has vehemently argued that keeping in view seriousness of

offence, petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail.

Custody certificate filed on behalf of respondent-State is taken on record.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully gone through the records.

At this stage, without commenting anything on the merits of the case lest it may prejudice the outcome of the trial but taking into consideration the fact

that petitioner is in custody since 05.12.2019; that petitioner is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation purpose; that challan has

already been presented in Court and since trial of the case would take sufficient time to conclude, no useful purpose would be served by detaining the

petitioner in custody further, thus, he deserves the concession of bail.

In view of above, instant petition for grant of regular bail moved by petitioner-NITISH is allowed and he is ordered to be released on bail on his

furnishing personal/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Trial Court/ Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Chandigarh, as the case may be.