High CourtsSingle Bench

N.K. Anitha vs Federal Bank Ltd

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 21 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 KL CK 0168

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. Badharudeen, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 227
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Petition (C) No. 144 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 190 words

@Judgmenttag-Judgment

A.Badharudeen, J.

1.

The second judgment debtor in E.P.105/2013 in O.S.128/2009 has filed this Original Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to stay

the delivery ordered by the execution court.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on admission.

3.

It is an admitted fact that the sale was confirmed as early on 29.11.2016. What remains is delivery. By the time, the legal remedies available to the

second judgment debtor/petitioner herein is exhausted, and therefore, no interference is permissible within the ambit of law.

4.

In view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the order of delivery as the same is not justifiable. Therefore, the Original Petition lacks

merits and is dismissed.

5.

It is made clear that if the petitioner is having any intention to re-convey the property after paying the due towards the bank, he can opt for the said

remedy as part of conciliation between decree-holder and the second judgment debtor/ by way of negotiation.

Registry is directed to forward a copy of this judgment to the court below concerned, forthwith by email, for information and further steps.