High CourtsSingle Bench

O.I.C. Ltd vs Bhagywanti Mertiya And Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 27 August 2019 · Citation: (2019) 08 RAJ CK 0176

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2797, 2789 Of 2016, 240, 241 Of 2017
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

57 paragraphs · 783 words

All these appeals arise out of the one and same award and therefore, they shall stand decided by this common judgment.

The Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 2797/2016 and 2789/2016 have been filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited and the Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 240/2017 & 241/2017 have been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of the compensation, in respect of the Award dated 22.09.2016 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sirohi in Claim Case Nos. 137/2013 and 74/2013.

The claimants preferred the respective claim petitions on various grounds before the learned tribunal for grant of compensation. The separate replies were filed on behalf of the non-claimant - insurance company denying the allegations in the claim petition. Thereafter, on completion of the pleadings the learned tribunal framed the issues.

After hearing the counsel for the parties, the learned tribunal decided the claim petitions of the claimants and awarded a sum of Rs. 17,73,118/- and Rs. 14,23,000/-, respectively, in favour of the claimants and directed the appellant to pay an interest @ 7.5% per annum on the amount awarded.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Mr. L.D. Khatri, learned counsel for the appellant - Oriental Insurance Company Limited submits that although, the appeals have been filed by the insurance company on numerous grounds but in view of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.L.P. (Civil) Case No. 25590/2014 (National Insurance Company Limited V/s Pranay Sethi & Ors.) reported in 2017/ACJ/2700, 2017(4)J.L.J.R. 275, 2017(4)P.L.J.R. 261, the computation of the award is required to be recomputed. Learned counsel further submits that computation of the award made by the learned tribunal qua future prospects is on the higher side as admittedly, the deceased were less than 40 years of age and was not in any permanent job and therefore, the learned tribunal should have taken into consideration only 40% increase in the income of the deceased towards future prospects. Since the learned tribunal has computed the award by taking into consideration 50% increase in the income of the deceased towards the future prospects, the same is required to be reduced to 40%.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents-claimants submits that there are other grounds, on which the claimants are entitled for a higher compensation. But taking into consideration the fact that the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has not made the computation of award qua future prospects in light of the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra), and therefore, the same may be recomputed in the light of the judgment in the case of Pranay Sethi (supra).

Considering the submissions made at the Bar, the award impugned is recomputed as under :-

S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 2797/2016 & 240/2017

For future prospects :-

40% of Rs. 1,21,934/- (Annual Income of deceased)

Rs. 48,774/-/-

Rs. 1,21,934/- + Rs. 48,774/-

Rs. 1,70,708/-

Amount to be deducted as spent on himself (annual).

Rs. 1,70,708/- 1/2 = Rs. 85,354/-

Dependence Amount (Annual)

Rs. 1,70,708/- - Rs. 85,354/- = Rs. 85,354/-

The age of deceased was 23 years therefore, a multiplier of 18 will be used.

(I)

Compensation due to death

85,354/- x 18

Rs. 15,36,372/-

(II)

For the Loss of Estate

Rs. 15,000/-

(III)

Funeral Expenses

Rs. 15,000 /-

Total

Rs. 15,66,372/-

S. B. Civil Misc. Appeal Nos. 2789/2016 & 241/2017

For future prospects :-

40% of Rs. 8,000/- (Income of deceased)

Rs. 3,200/-/-

Rs. 8,000/- + Rs. 3,200/-

Rs. 11,200/-

Amount to be deducted as spent on himself

Rs. 11,200/- 1/2 = Rs. 5,600/-

Dependence Amount

Rs. 11,200/- - Rs. 5,600/- = Rs. 5,600/-

The age of deceased was 24 years therefore, a multiplier of 18 will be used.

(I)

Compensation due to death

Rs. 5600/- x 12 x 18

Rs. 12,09,600/-

(II)

For the Loss of Estate

Rs. 15,000/-

(III)

Funeral Expenses

Rs. 15,000 /-

Total

Rs. 12,39,600/-

No other grounds have been pressed into service by the learned counsel for the parties, therefore, the other factors taken into consideration by the learned tribunal are being not disturbed.

Consequently, in view of the calculation made above, the respondents-claimants are entitled for a total amount of compensation of Rs. 15,66,372/- (in CMA Nos.2797/16 & 240/2017) and Rs. 12,39,600/- (in CMA Nos.2789/16 & 241/2017). The appellants are also entitled to an interest @ 7.5% on the awarded sum from the date of filing of the claim petitions. The amount so determined above shall be paid to the respondents-claimants within a period of four weeks.

With the above modifications, the present misc. appeals are disposed of in the above terms. Stay petition in CMA No. 2797/2016 & 2789/2016 also stand disposed of.