High CourtsSingle Bench

Om Pardeep vs State Of H.P. Andother

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 9 July 2021 · Citation: (2021) 07 SHI CK 0099

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anoop Chitkara, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438, 439
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 1281 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 172 words

Anoop Chitkara, J

1.

The present petition has been field by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.PC, whereas the offences are punishable under the Scheduled Caste &

Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

2.

It is in extremely exceptional cases that such application could have been entertained under Section 438 Cr.PC. I am of the considered view that

the present case does not fall under the category of exception as laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs. Union

of India, 2020 SCC online SC 159.

3.

At this stage, Mr. Deepak Arora, learned counsel, for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh

under Section 439 Cr.PC with a request for interim bail. Permission granted. Liberty reserved.

4.

Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General to supply copy of the status report to enable the petitioner to also annex the status

report with the new petition, if so filed.

Given above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.