High CourtsSingle Bench

Ombir Singh vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 27 August 2018 · Citation: (2018) 08 UK CK 0133

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section, 328, 363, 366A, 368
RESULT
List this case on 22.10.2018 in the daily cause li
CASE NUMBER
Short Term Bail Extension Application No. 1651 of 2018 In Short Term Bail Application No. 11 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 218 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

1.

Heard Mr. Tapan Singh, Advocate for the applicant and Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the State.

2.

The applicant is in jail having been implicated in Case Crime No. 190 of 2015, which has been registered under Sections 363/364-A/368 and 328 of

IPC, at Police Station Rishikesh, Dehradun.

3.

The applicant is being diagnosed of cancer and is undergoing treatment at PGIMS at Rohtak. It is for this reason, the applicant was given short

term bail, which expired on 25.08.2018. The application for extension of short term bail though was moved by the applicant prior to 25.08.2018 but it

could not come on board and it has come on board today.

4.

Considering the critical condition of the applicant, this Court is inclined to extend the short term bail to the applicant for a further period of two

months. The short term bail is hereby extended for a period of further two months, on the same sureties and conditions. The applicant need not

surrender meanwhile. The learned Magistrate shall, however, ascertain through his counterpart the learned Magistrate, at Rohtak, Haryana, where the

applicant is undergoing his treatment in PGIMS Rohtak as alleged, and file a report before this Court, within three weeks.

5.

List this case on 22.10.2018 in the daily cause list.