High CourtsSingle Bench

Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs Daneshwari And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 12 February 2018 · Citation: (2018) 02 CHH CK 0206

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Appeal (C) No. 692 Of 2015

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 302 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

Present is an appeal filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act assailing the award dated 27/02/2015 passed by

the learned Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bemetara (C.G.) in Motor Accident Claim Case No.24/2015.

2.

Vide the impugned award, the Tribunal in a death case under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act has awarded a compensation of Rs.8,04,000/-.

3.

The challenge in the present appeal is on the ground that, the Tribunal has not properly appreciated the contributory negligence aspect so also the

deduction made is also on the higher side and therefore the amount of compensation awarded deserves suitable modification.

4.

Perusal of record would show that, the Insurance Company in the instant case has not led any evidence before the Tribunal to substantiate any of

their contentions.

5.

The ground of contributory negligence raised by the counsel for the Insurance Company was only on the ground that, three persons were traveling

on the Motorcycle. The said ground is not a strong ground for absolving the Insurance Company of its liability as has been settled by a catena of

decisions.

6.

Further the ground of there was a head on collision also is not sustainable for the simple reason that, there is no evidence to show that the deceased

had crossed over the road on the wrong side and had met with head on collision with the vehicle coming from opposite direction.

7.

So far as Ex-P/2 is concerned which has been referred to by the claimant by itself cannot be a strong base for the Insurance Company to claim

exoneration of the payment of compensation part.

8.

In the absence of any evidence led by the Insurance Company, the appeal fails and deserve to be and is accordingly rejected.