Supreme CourtFull Bench(1992) 03 SC CK 0062

P. Sathrughan Pillai vs Commissioner of Wealth Tax

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 10 March 1992 · Citation: (1993) 199 ITR 7

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yogeshwar Dayal, J · V. Ramaswami, J · S. Ranganathan, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 580 and 582 of 1977

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 207 words
1.

The question raised in these appeals which are under the Wealth- tax Act, 1957, is whether the liability for payment of gratuity to employees in terms of the Kerala Industrial Employees (Payment of Gratuity) Act, 1970, is deductible as a debt owing on the valuation date. The High Court has applied the decision of this Court in the case of Standard Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay City, the principle of which was reiterated; in Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bombay, Learned Counsel for the appellants seeks to persuade us to reconsider the decision in the case of Standard Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay City, Apart from the fact that we see no reasons to doubt the correctness of this decision which has held the field for about 25 years and has also been reaffirmed in the subsequent decision of this Court, we are also informed that the stakes involved in the present appeals are only a few hundred rupees each. In these circumstances, we do not think that there is any justification to think of reconsidering the said decision. The appeals, therefore, fail and stand dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.