AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
6 paragraphs · 122 wordsWallace, J.—There can be no doubt that, under the amendments to Rules 3 and 10 under the Explosives Act even throw downs"" and
Chinese crackers are explosives."" The previous rulings of this Court to the contrary were based on an oversight of the amendments, and cannot be
regarded as now applicable.
Technically then, the petitioner is guilty of the offence. But in the circumstances petitioner may be forgiven for not possessing more knowledge
on the point than learned Judges of the High Court. It would have been sufficient if he had been warned not to repeat the offence. That I cannot do
now, as he is absent. The fine is reduced to rupee one. The balance if paid will be refunded.