High CourtsDivision Bench

Padam Bahadur vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 3 August 2011 · Citation: (2011) 08 SHI CK 0152

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · Rajiv Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. No. 5853 of 2011
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 299 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

(i). That the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner as Beldar wef due date, ie 112008, when the petitioner has completed 8 years of service on daily wage basis as Beldar, as per the policy of state Govt. and also as per the decision rendered by this Hon''ble Court in case titled as Man Singh vs. State of H.P. in C.W.P. No. 1594/2008.

(ii) That the respondents may further be directed to give the all consequential benefits in favour of the petitioner wef 112008 till the date of realization along with interest @ 18% per annum.

2.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in CWP No. 1594 of 2008 titled as Man Singh v. State of H.P. and Ors., decided on 27.7.2009.

3.

Learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. Petitioner submits that he would file an appropriate representation furnishing all factual details before the competent authority within a period of one month from today. It is always open for him to do so.

4.

Therefore, in the event of the petitioner approaching the first respondent within a period of one month, the matter will be duly considered by the first respondent/competent authority in the light of the judgment, referred to above and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken within another four months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a copy of this judgment and the copy of the judgment, referred to above.

5.

The writ petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.