High CourtsSingle Bench

Padma Arora & Ors vs Rajesh Narula

Delhi High Court · Decided on 18 November 2019 · Citation: (2019) 11 DEL CK 0203

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 — Section 14(1)(e)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
RC.Revision No. 564 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 355 words

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J

RC.REV. 564/2019 & CM APPL. No.42680/2019 (stay)

1.

Petitioners impugn order dated 11.03.2019, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioners was dismissed and an eviction order passed.

2.

Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one shop bearing No.15, A Block, Poorvi Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions from the petitioners, who are present in Court in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.

Petitioners, who are present in Court in person, undertake that they shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.05.2020. Petitioners further undertake that they shall pay use and occupation charges at the agreed rate of Rs.1364/- per month till the time he hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.05.2020.

5.

Petitioners further undertake that they shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before they vacate the premises on or before 31.05.2020. Petitioners further undertake that they shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the tenanted premises or any part thereof. They further undertake that they shall not cause any damage to the tenanted premises and hand over the possession of the same to the Respondent in the same condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.

6.

The undertaking is accepted.

7.

Learned counsel for the respondents under instructions from the respondents submits that the undertaking is also acceptable to the respondent.

8.

In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

9.

Subject to petitioners filing an affidavit of undertaking in the above terms within a period of two weeks from today, execution of the impugned order dated 11.03.2019 shall remain stayed till 31.05.2020.

10.

Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.