High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 12 AP CK 0071

Padmanabha Traders vs Commercial Tax Officer and Others

Andhra Pradesh High Court · Decided on 31 December 2002

HON’BLE JUDGES
Motilal B. Naik, Acting C.J. · Dalava Subrahmanyam, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 25226 of 2002

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 175 words
1.

The point for consideration before this Court in this writ petition is whether the payment of disputed tax could be stayed pending a decision by the appellate authority.

2.

Heard both the counsel.

3.

According to the counsel for the petitioner, for the assessment year 1997-98, the tax liability was determined and thereafter the matter has been carried before the appellate authority. Pending the appellate authority taking a decision, a stay application was filed before the 3rd respondent, who rejected the request made on behalf of the petitioner holding that the stay cannot be granted in a case of this nature.

4.

Having heard the counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, we are of the view that the writ petition could be disposed of directing the respondents to dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible. However, the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the disputed tax within a period of 4 (four) weeks from today. This deposit would, however, subject to the outcome of the appeal. No costs.