High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 02 UK CK 0103

Padmavati vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 27 February 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/S) No. 494 Of 2023

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 138 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with an innocuous prayer that Tehsildar, Haridwar be directed to decide the Restoration Application, pending in Suit No. 394/2015-16, “Narendra Kumar Vs. Padmavati”, expeditiously without any delay as early as possible.

2.

Heard Mr. Sunil Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Yogesh Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, while directing the Tehsildar concerned to expedite the proceedings of the Restoration Application, pending in Suit No. 394/2015-16, it is also directed that the said restoration application be decided expeditiously, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

4.

Writ Petition (M/S No. 494 of 2023) stands disposed of accordingly.