AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
24 paragraphs · 494 wordsThe Additional Commissioner, Central Excise, Jaipur-II by the order dated 24.2.2012 confirmed service tax demand of Rs.41,64,840/- besides
interest and penalties as specified therein against the appellant. Aggrieved thereby, an appeal was preferred by appellant before the Commissioner
(Appeals) which was rejected vide the impugned order dated 7.6.2013. The stay application was disposed on 27.11.2014, ex-parte.
Since notice of hearing of the stay application dispatched to the appellant was returned with a postal endorsement ""unclaimed"", by the order dated
27.11.2014 and for reasons recorded therein we dismissed the stay application for default and directed the appellant to pre-deposit the assessed
liability to tax, interest and penalty within four weeks and report compliance by 22.1.2015. The order also endorsed a default clause stipulating that
appeal would stand dismissed for failure of pre-deposit.
Against a pre-deposit order dated 11.2.2013 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) (in the appeal preferred by the appellant herein) directing pre-
deposit of Rs.25 lakhs, the appellant filed a writ petition before High Court of Rajasthan. During pendency of the writ petition, appellant received a
notice for personal hearing from the office of the Commissioner (Appeals), scheduled on 29.5.2013. On 22.7.2013, the writ petition was dismissed by
the Rajasthan High Court and the appellant was directed to comply with the order of the Appellate Commissioner, dated 11.2.2013.
Against the (impugned) order dated 7.6.2013 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) the appellant not only preferred this appeal but also filed a
Misc. application before the High Court of Rajasthan seeking inter alia, re-call or modification of the High Court's order dated 22.7.2013 as well as
interdiction of the impugned order of the Id. Commissioner (Appeals).
On 4.12.2013, the Rajasthan High Court disposed of the Misc. application preferred by the appellant and directed a further deposit of Rs.16,64,840/-
(after noticing that Rs. 25 lakhs as per the interim direction of the Id. Commissioner was already remitted). The High Court directed that upon the
further deposit of Rs.16,64,840/-, the impugned appellate order dated 7.6.2013 stands annulled and the appeal preferred by the appellant against the
primary adjudication order dated 24.2.2012, shall stand revived.
The present application is filed seeking re-call of the order dated 27.11.2014 which endorsed a default clause stipulating dismissal of the appeal on
non-compliance with the pre-deposit order. Ld. Counsel also states that in the light of the Final Order of the Rajasthan High Court dated 4.12.2013 the
appeal itself has become infructuous since the appellant has deposited the amount of Rs.16,64,840/-, in terms of the High Court's order.
In the facts and circumstances of this case, while recording our disapproval of the conduct of the appellant in pursuing parallel remedies against the
order dated 7.6.2013 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, Jaipur, in view of the final order of the High Court of Rajasthan dated
4.12.2013, we recall the order dated 27.11.2014 and dismiss the appeal as infructuous. The Misc. application is also disposed of.
