High CourtsDivision Bench

Palakal Raman Menon and Another vs Valia Chembashith Imoth Karnavan and Manager, Krishna Nambudripad

Madras High Court · Decided on 28 April 1910 · Citation: 6 Ind. Cas. 889(1)

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, J · Krishnaswamy Aiyar, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Malabar Compensation for Tenants Improvements Act, 1899 — Section 5, 6
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 126 words
1.

The relation of mortgagor and mortgagee continues until redemption. Though the-mortgage amount had been discharged by the arrears of rent, the plaintiff was bound to pay the value of improvements. And until ejectment in execution of a decree, the mortgagee is entitled to be in possession on the same terms as before: Sections 5 and 6 of Madras Act I of 1900. The plaintiff cannot, therefore, claim mesne profits from the date of suit. We modify the decree of the lower appellate Court as regards mesne profits and direct instead the payment of 60 paras of paddy and Rs. 5-8-0 per annum from 1082 till redemption. The decree of the Court below is otherwise confirmed. The appellant is entitled to the costs of this appeal.