Palpandi @ Paulpandi vs State

S.Srimathy, J

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of IPC, in Crime No.276 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. seeks bail.

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused had received a sum of Rs.6,55,000/- from the defacto complainant on the pretext of arranging a job for him at Singapore and they have neither returned the money to the de facto complainant nor secured a job for him. Hence, the complaint.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any conditions which may be imposed by this Court and he is in judicial custody from 17.11.2025. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner had cheated the defacto complainant on the pretext of arranging a job for him at Singapore and they have neither returned the money to the de facto complainant nor secured a job for him and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also consideration the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant interim bail to the petitioner till 09.01.2026, subject to the following conditions:

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District, and on further conditions that :-

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

Post the matter on 09.01.2026.