High CourtsSingle Bench

Pammu Alam vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 11 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 JH CK 0030

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ambuj Nath, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 313, 323, 376(2), 506, 509
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 11393 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 185 words

Ambuj Nath, J

1.

Heard the parties.

2.

Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Dumri P.S. Case No. 28 of 2023 for the offences registered under sections 376 (2) (n)/313/323/506/509 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Miss J.S. Kujur, learned Judicial Magistrate, Gumla.

3.

Petitioner is said to have established physical relationship with the prosecutrix who is a major lady on the pretext of marriage,

4.

It was submitted that the petitioner and the prosecutrix were in relationship since last four years and when the petitioner refused to marry her, this case has been instituted.

5.

There is nothing on the record to show that the petitioner has obtained consent for physical relationship with the prosecutrix by fraud at the very inception of their relationship.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Miss J.S. Kujur, learned Judicial Magistrate, Gumla in connection with Dumri P.S. Case No. 28 of 2023.