High CourtsDivision Bench(1903) 07 BOM CK 0010

Pandharinath Sakharam vs Shankar Narayan Joshi

Bombay High Court · Decided on 21 July 1903 · Citation: (1906) 8 BOMLR 488

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lawrence Jenkins, J · Jacob, J
CASE NUMBER
Second Appeal No. 738 of 1902

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 177 words

Lawrence Jenkins, K.C.I.E., C.J.—The only part of the decree with which we think it necessary to interfere is that which follows on the direction for payment by instalments. For, what succeeds that direction appears to us to be contrary to the provisions of Section 15 (b) of the Dekkhan Agriculturists'' Relief Act XVII of 1879, and in place of that part of the decree which commences with the words " and on failure to pay any two successive instalments &c. " the decree should contain the following direction :-

If the sum payable under the direction aforesaid is not paid when due, then defendant No. 1 will be at liberty to apply to the Court for such order as he may be entitled to u/s 15 (b), sub-section 2 of the Dekkhan Agriculturists'' Relief Act.

2.

We further direct that the first instalment be paid on the 1st January 1904 and the subsequent instalments on the 1st of January of each succeeding year.

3.

The appellant must pay two-thirds of respondent No. 1''s costs of this appeal.