High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 03 BOM CK 0028

Pandurang And Others vs State Of Maharashtra And Others

Bombay High Court · Decided on 7 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. V. Gangapurwala, J · S. G. Dige, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No.3209 Of 2022

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 231 words

S. V. Gangapurwala, J

1.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

2.

Heard finally with the consent of learned Counsel for the respective parties.

3.

The issue raised in this petition is no more res integra and is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.7256 of 2011 and other companion matters decided on 2nd December 2013 as well as decision of the Division Bench at Mumbai in Writ Petition No.2358 of 2013 and other companion matters decided on 21 st September 2013.

4.

In the facts of this case and in view of the judgments referred above, writ petition deserves to be allowed and the same is accordingly allowed. Respondents are directed to examine the case of each of the individual petitioners for deciding whether they satisfy the criteria laid down under ACPS scheme applicable to private aided government schools under the Government Resolution dated 30-04-1998 as amended from time to time and if it is found that petitioners are entitled to claim benefits under the scheme and they satisfy the eligibility criteria, respondents shall extend the benefits to them. Respondents shall scrutinize case of the individual petitioners within a period of six months and extend the benefits to the eligible petitioner as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of four months from such scrutiny.

5.

Rule made absolute in the above terms. No costs.