High CourtsSingle Bench

Panimayaraj and Others vs The District Collector, The Assistant Project Officer, District Executive Unit (Tsunami) and The Tahsildar

Madras High Court · Decided on 19 November 2010 · Citation: (2010) 11 MAD CK 0318

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (MD) No. 13786 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 236 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—Heard Mr. S.K. Patturaja, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners, as well as Mr. R. Manoharan, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents.

2.

At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner had submitted that it would suffice, if the representation of the Petitioner, dated 11.10.2010, is directed to be disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period.

3.

The learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondents, has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court.

4.

In view of the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and in view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner, the first Respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the Petitioner''s representation, dated 11.10.2010, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the representation, dated 11.10.2010, along with a copy of this order, to the first Respondent. However, it is made clear, that this Court, by this order, has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

5.

The writ petition stands disposed of, with the above directions. No costs.