High CourtsSingle Bench

Panuram Kashyap vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 13 January 2022 · Citation: (2022) 01 CHH CK 0032

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajani Dubey, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(b)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 6275 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 380 words
1.

The matter is heard through video conferencing.

2.

The accused/applicant has moved this second bail application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for releasing him on regular bail during

trial in connection with Crime No.15/2019 registered at Police Station- Puspal, District- Sukma (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20 (b)

the N.D.P.S. Act.

3.

Earlier, the first bail application of the applicant was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.11.2020 passed in MCRC No. 1496/2020 by this

Court.

4.

The prosecution story, in brief is that, on 22.10.2019, on the basis of secret information, police personnel seized 22 KG of Ganja from the possession

of present applicant and 20.573 KG of Ganja from the possession of another accused person. Thereafter, offence has been registered against the

applicant and accused and they have been taken into custody.

5.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits

that memorandum and seizure witnesses have not supported the prosecution case before the trial court and declared hostile. He next added that the

applicant is in jail since 22.10.2019, there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, therefore, the present applicant may be released on

bail.

6.

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

7.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

8.

Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, and further considering the facts that

memorandum and seizure witnesses have not supported the prosecution case before the trial court and declared hostile and the applicant is in jail since

22.10.2019, the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to release the applicant on bail.

Accordingly, the application is allowed.

9.

Accused/applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/-, with one local surety in the like sum

to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the said Court.