High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 04 GUJ CK 0026

Pappu Damodar Nike vs State Of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 15 April 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.Y. Kogje, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
R/Criminal Misc.Application No. 4754 Of 2021

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

40 paragraphs · 708 words

A.Y. Kogje, J

1.

RULE. Learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent State.

2.

The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR

No.11209020210270 of 2021 registered with Idar Police Station, Sabarkantha for offence under Sections 25(1-b)

(a) of the Arms Act and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act.

3.

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of the offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular

bail by imposing suitable conditions.

4.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

5.

Learned Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

6.

I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers. Following aspects are considered:-

I. The FIR is registered on 11.02.2021 for the offence which is alleged to have taken place on 10.02.2021.

II. The applicant is in jail since 22.02.2021.

III. The investigation qua the applicant is concluded as the remand period is over.

IV. Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that the applicant has been named in FIR only on the basis of statement of co -accused, but was

not actually in possession of the firearm.

V. Submission of learned advocate for the applicant that the co-accused Jagdishbhai Nathuji Gurjar who was found to be in possession of the firearm

has been enlarged on regular bail by Sessions Court, Sabarkantha at Idar in Criminal Misc., Application No.138 of 2021 by order dated 02.04.2021.

VI. As per learned advocate for the applicant, the applicant is not having any antecedents.

VII. Learned APP under instructions of IO is unable to bring on record any special circumstances against the applicant.

7.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing

the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail.

8.

Hence, the present application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with FIR being I-CR

No.11209020210270 of 2021 registered with Idar Police Station, Sabarkantha, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand

only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police investigation and shall not to play mischief

with the evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Trial Court concerned;

(e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in a month for a period of six months between 11.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m.;

(f) furnish the present address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not

change the residence without prior permission of Trial Court;

9.

The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the

above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10.

Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or

relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law.

11.

At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage made by this Court while

enlarging the applicant on bail.

12.

Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.