High CourtsSINGLE BENCH

Pappu Singh @ Roop Singh S/o Sh. Val Singh vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 4 May 2017 · Citation: (2017) 05 RAJ CK 0018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
575 of 2017

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 254 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Public

Prosecutor. Perused the order under challenge.

2.

This appeal has been preferred on behalf of the appellant

Pappu Singh @ Roop Singh under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015 being aggrieved of

the order dated 6.4.2017 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocity) Cases, Udaipur in Cr. Case No.140/2017

rejecting the bail application preferred on behalf of the appellant

who is in custody in connection with FIR No.106/2017, Police

Station Ambamata, Udaipur, for the offences under Sections 365,

342 and 323 / 34 IPC and Section 3(1) ( n)(/k)(M+) of SC/ST

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

3.

Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances

available on record and particularly, the fact that the FIR was

lodged after some delay, but without expressing any opinion on

the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the

appellant is entitled to be released on bail.

4.

Consequently, the appeal is allowed. The order dated

6.4.2017 is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant

Pappu Singh @ Roop Singh arrested in connection with FIR

No.106/2017, Police Station Ambamata, Udaipur shall be released

on bail during pendency of the trial; provided he furnishes a

personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the

stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and

as and when called upon to do so.