AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
23 paragraphs · 285 wordsPetitioner has been arrested on 16.02.2017 and has approached this
Court for grant of regular bail.
It is the contention of learned counsel for the petitioner that two of
the co-accused, namely, Jaspreet Singh @ Jassi and Makhan Singh @ Andy have
already been granted bail by this Court on 14.03.2017. He contends that no
recovery has been effected from the petitioner. The challan has already been
presented before the Court. He further contends that the petitioner may be released
on bail as the trial is likely to take a long time to conclude.
Learned counsel for the State on the other hand contends that
although, no recovery has been effected from the petitioner but she is the main
person as it is, at her behest that the crime was to be committed as per the
information received by the police authorities leading to the registration of the FIR
and accordingly raid was conducted and arrest made. She had a love affair with
Satinder Singh, who was to be eliminated at her behest as he had married some
other lady. Prayer has, thus, been made for dismissal of the present petition.
Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the
parties and keeping in view the allegations which have been made in the FIR as
also the fact that two other co-accused referred to above, have already been
granted bail by this Court, and the fact that the petitioner has completed more than
four and a half months in custody and the challan has also been presented,
petitioner is admitted to bail to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Chief Judicial
Magistrate/Duty Magistrate, Saheed Bhagat Singh Nagar.
Petition stands allowed.
