Supreme CourtDivision Bench

Paramjit Singh vs State of Punjab and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 17 July 2008 · Citation: (2008) 2 OLR 501

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarun Chatterjee, J · Aftab Alam, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) — Section 100
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 4620 of 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 3664 of 2007)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 190 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

After having heard learned Counsel for the parties and after going through the final judgment and order dt. 05.02.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Regular Second Appeal No. 3876 of 1997, we find that the High Court without framing any substantial question of law allowed the Second Appeal of the Respondent u/s 100 CPC and set aside the findings of the two courts below. In view of the decision of this Court in Gian Dass Vs. The Gram Panchayat, Village Sunner Kalan and Others, and C.A. Sulaiman and Others Vs. State Bank of Travancore, Alwayee and Others, in which it was held that without formulating the substantial question of law, judgment rendered by the High Court in second appeal cannot be sustained, we set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and remit the matter back to the High Court to decide the same afresh on merits, after formulating a substantial question of law, within six months from the date of communication of this order. The appeal is allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.