AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
21 paragraphs · 396 wordsH.S. MADAAN, J
Petitioner Paramjit Singh, an accused in F.I.R. No. 149 dated 7.9.2015 under Section 419 IPC registered with Police Station Guruhar Sahai faced
trial by Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Guruhar Sahai on the allegations that on 7.9.2015, he impersonating as Jagsir Singh son of Wazir Singh
while taking up 10th class examination of Social Studies subject in Guru Gobind Singh Public Senior Secondary School, Guruhar Sahai-II was
caught red handed.
Formal F.I.R. was registered. The petitioner was arrested in this case. After completion of investigation, he was challaned and tried for offence
under Section 419 IPC which ended in his conviction for the said offence and he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years
vide judgment/conviction order dated 12.8.2016. He had preferred an appeal to the Court of Sessions which was assigned to Additional Sessions
Judge, Ferozepur, who vide judgment dated 16.2.2017 dismissed that appeal, as such he has approached this Court by way of filing Criminal
Revision Petition, notice of which was given to the State.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State counsel besides going through the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not challenge the judgment passed by the Courts below on the point of conviction but wants
to put forward submissions with regard to sentence part. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner-convict is a poor person; he is a
1st offender and only earning member in the family; he has already undergone 1 year and 2 months, as such a lenient view be taken.
As per custody certificate filed by the State counsel, the petitioner-convict has undergone 1 year and 2 months of total substantive sentence of 2
years. He is not shown to be involved in any other criminal case.
Considering the circumstances explained by counsel for the petitioner and in the light of other attending circumstances, I am of the view that ends
or justice shall be adequately met, if while maintaining the conviction of the petitioner-accused his sentence is reduced to one already undergone by
him in this case. It is ordered accordingly. Petitioner Paramjit Singh is stated to be in jail in this case. Superintendent Central Jail, Ferozepur is
directed to release the petitioner immediately, if his custody is not required in connection with any other case.
The Criminal Revision Petition stands disposed of.
