High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 09 GUJ CK 0173

Parbatbhai Mulubhai Nanera vs Porbandar Nagar Palika

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 21 September 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mukesh R. Shah, J
CASE NUMBER
Special Civil Application No. 10622 of 2010

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 445 words

M.R. Shah, J.—Rule. Mr. Murali Devnani, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent.

2.

With the consent of the leaned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, the present petition is taken up for final hearing today.

3.

The present petition has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the impugned judgment and award dated 11/03/2010 passed by Labour Court, Junagadh, Camp at Porbandar in Reference (LCJ) No. 135 of 2000, by which, Labour Court, Junagadh has directed to pay lumpsum monetary compensation of Rs. 15,000/ - in lieu of reinstatement and backwages to the petitioner herein.

It is to be noted that this Court issued Notice only for the purpose of enhancing the amount of compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages considering seven years service as daily wager.

4.

Mr. Mishra, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has requested to enhance the amount of compensation looking to the length of service of the petitioner. It is submitted that Labour Court has awarded meager amount of Rs. 15,000/ - as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages, and, therefore, it is requested to enhance the amount of compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages.

5.

Mr. Murali Devnani, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent is not in a position to satisfy the Court that the amount of Rs. 15,000/ - as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages, can be justified.

6.

Having heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and considering the length of service of seven years as daily wager and considering the recent decision of the Hon''ble Supreme Court rendered in the case of Senior Superintendent Telegraph (Traffic) Bhopal Vs. Santosh Kumar Seal and Others, , it appears to the Court that instead of Rs. 15,000/ -, if the petitioner is awarded lumpsum amount of Rs. 40,000/ - as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages, it will meet the ends of justice.

7.

In view of the above, the petition succeeds in part. The impugned judgment and award dated 11/03/2010 passed by Labour Court, Junagadh, Camp at Porbandar in Reference (LCJ) No. 135 of 2000 is hereby modified to the extent that instead of Rs. 15,000/ -, the respondent is hereby directed to pay Rs. 40,000/ - to the petitioner as compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages. The aforesaid amount shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, failing which, it will carry interest at the rate of 9% per annum. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. No costs.